Mousa v. Lauda Air Luftfahrt, A.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the plaintiffs argument that an employee need only cross the U.S. border to be counted
• “[T]he FCRA does not contain clauses similar to those in Title VII limiting its extraterritorial effect, nor is its meaning further articulated by an amendment history similar to that of Title VII.”
• noting the FCRA’s “purpose of protecting Floridians from discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).