Mourad v. Farrell (In Re V&M Management, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff was precluded from relitigating issue of standing based on factual allegations available to him in prior suit
• explaining that issue preclusion barred plaintiff from re-litigating its standing
• “As we have previously held, section 2244(d)(1) is not a per se 7 violation of the Suspension Clause.”
• “To the extent [the plaintiff] now seeks to add … new (but previously available) factual allegations to establish his standing to bring the present claims, such assertions do not defeat the bar of issue preclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).