Skip to main content
· 3/29/2002

Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Harris

Citations

  • 193 F. Supp. 2d 674
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5996
  • 2002 WL 499880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a fifty-day delay to conduct an investigation was reasonable as a matter of law
  • “Determining whether or not the delay in disclaiming was reasonable is generally a question of fact for the jury.”
  • finding a fifty-day delay reasonable in order for insurer to conduct a “prompt investigation” into the claim
  • “New York courts have also consistently recognized that a prompt, good faith investigation of the claim by the insurer may justify a-delay that would normally be deemed unreasonable absent explanation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dearie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.