Mount Juneau Enterprises, Inc. v. City & Borough of Juneau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing motion to continue discovery under Civil Rule 56(f) for an abuse of discretion
• affirming denial of Rule 56(F) continuance in part because \the superior court did not believe that a genuine issue of material fact would emerge from further discovery\
• provision in agreement that in the future municipality would treat property owner's claim as valuable and transfer land in exchange for an agreement to abandon land is likely unenforceable because it requires assembly in advance to agree to future legislative action
• reviewing decision to continue discovery under Civil Rule 56(f
• “The law is clear that a legislative body may not limit its power to act one way or another in the future in governmental[,] as opposed to proprietary, functions.” (quoting City of Louisville v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson Cnty., 623 S.W.2d 219, 224 (Ky. 1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).