Mount Emmons Mining Co. v. Babbitt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a]lthough not unlimited, relevance, for purposes of discovery, is an extremely broad concept.”
• “New York Courts do not recognize a privilege which would protect plaintiff from giving deposition testimony infringing on his right to privacy”
• “Although not unlimited, relevance, for purposes of discovery, is an extremely broad concept.”
• “Because of the broad relevance standard, which should not be limited lightly, and plaintiff opening the door to his financial information as indicated by defendant, this Court finds the information in this regard sought during Condit's deposition relevant and discoverable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).