· 9/10/2014
Moultrie Ex Rel. Estate of Moultrie v. Penn Aluminum International, LLC
Citations
- 766 F.3d 747
- 200 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3525
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17570
- 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,150
- 124 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 719
- 2014 WL 4435864
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining Title VII and Illinois state law claims together because “[t]he standards for Illinois state- law discrimination claims mirror those for Title VII claims.”
- criticizing plaintiff for presenting claims that were \something of a moving target\
- “To establish retaliation pursuant to Title VII, the employer must have had actual knowledge of the protected activity in order for its decisions to be retaliatory[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Sykes, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.