Skip to main content
· 9/10/2014

Moultrie Ex Rel. Estate of Moultrie v. Penn Aluminum International, LLC

Citations

  • 766 F.3d 747
  • 200 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3525
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17570
  • 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,150
  • 124 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 719
  • 2014 WL 4435864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining Title VII and Illinois state law claims together because “[t]he standards for Illinois state- law discrimination claims mirror those for Title VII claims.”
  • criticizing plaintiff for presenting claims that were \something of a moving target\
  • “To establish retaliation pursuant to Title VII, the employer must have had actual knowledge of the protected activity in order for its decisions to be retaliatory[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Sykes, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.