· 2/3/1994
Mottoshiski v. Fingar
Citations
- 201 A.D.2d 800
- 608 N.Y.S.2d 888
- 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 880
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “California law on unjust enrichment is 26 not narrowly and rigidly limited to quasi-contract principles.”
- “The elements of a cause of action for unjust enrichment are simply stated as receipt of a 17 benefit and unjust retention of the benefit at the expense of another.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cardona
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.