· 3/23/1961
Motto v. Lang
Citations
- 13 A.D.2d 481
- 217 N.Y.S.2d 1014
- 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11903
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an article detailing the plaintiffs allegedly racist and anti-Semitic essay provided only non-actionable .opinion, where “there was full disclosure of the facts supporting the opinions”
- holding that news stories that described an essay written by the plaintiff as “racist” and “anti-Semitic” were non-actionable opinions, rather than actionable facts
- holding that news stories that labeled an essay written by the plaintiff as “racist” and “anti-Semitic” were nonactionable opinions, not facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.