Motten v. Chase Home Finance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking judicial 19 notice of “adjudicative facts” within FDA documents, but declining to judicially notice “other 20 content of the identified documents”
• “To the extent that Plaintiffs fraud claims are based on alleged misrepresentations and omissions Medtronic made while promoting and marketing the Infuse Device, such claims could survive preemption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).