Mott v. Sun Country Garden Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “it is error to allow an expert to testify on a 10 routine inference that jurors could draw for themselves”
• holding that expert testimony on the cause of an accident was 6 unnecessary when the cause alleged was one that could be assessed by reference to 7 common knowledge
• interpreting Thomas II as indicating that specific evidence of seat belt nonuse is not admissible in any negligence action for any purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).