Skip to main content
· 8/14/1975

Mott v. Stanlake

Citations

  • 234 N.W.2d 667
  • 63 Mich. App. 440
  • 1975 Mich. App. LEXIS 1184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an express provision for third parties indicates that an easement clause in a deed was intended to be an exception and not a reservation and renders the traditional rule virtually meaningless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Quinn, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.