Skip to main content
· 4/16/1987

Motown Record Corp. v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Citations

  • 657 F. Supp. 1236
  • 56 U.S.L.W. 2011
  • 3 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1124
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \[e]lements such as awareness or intent may alter the scope of the action but not its nature\ and finding the intentional interference claim preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.