Motorola, Inc. v. Lemko Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 9(b) does not apply to a section 1030(g) claim alleging violations of sections 1030(a)(2) and (a)(4)
• holding that Rule 9(b) does not apply to a section 1030(g) claim alleging violations of sections 1030(a)(2) and (a)(4
• “a plaintiff alleging violations of sections 1030(a)(2) or (a)(4) need only allege damage or loss, not both”
• Rule 9(b) “quite plainly applies to section 1030(a)(4)’s requirement that the defendant’s acts further the intended fraud.”
• allegations of loss “related to damage and security assessments . . . are sufficient to allege loss for purposes of the CFAA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).