Motorola, Inc. v. Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding claims that did not prejudice the appellant individually, did not prejudice him when considered in the aggregate
• explaining that merely because a strategy or tactic was unsuccessful does not render trial counsel ineffective
• finding no ineffectiveness for failing to investigate and present mental health evidence to support imperfect self-defense when there was no evidence supporting the other factors
• finding appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to preserve a meritless issue on appeal
• explaining application of Commonwealth v. Hubbard, 372 A.2d 687 (Pa. 1977), in cases predating Commonwealth v. Grant, 813 A.2d 726, 738 (Pa. 2002
• rejecting appellant’s argument that agreement was formed merely because witness expected prosecutor, who made no promise, to drop certain charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).