Motorola, Inc. v. Computer Displays International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court has jurisdiction to review orders regarding in- junctions where the district court “alters the legal relationship between the parties, whether by ‘modification’ or ‘interpreta- tion.’”
• holding that this court has jurisdiction to review orders regarding in- junctions where the district court “alters the legal relationship between the parties, whether by ‘modification’ or ‘interpreta- tion.’”
• holding that this court has jurisdiction to review orders regarding in- junctions where the district court “alters the legal relationship between the parties, whether by ‘modification’ or ‘interpreta- tion.’”
• “An order finding a party in civil contempt disposes of all the issues raised only if it includes both a finding of contempt and the imposition of a sanction.”
• “An order finding a party in civil contempt disposes of all the issues raised only if it includes both a finding of contempt and the imposition of a sanction.”
• “To say that the consent decree prohibited only the sale of a display monitor series identical to the MPG in all respects or with only minimal changes would make the injunction meaningless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).