· 7/27/1995
Motorists Insurance Companies v. Emig
Citations
- 664 A.2d 559
- 444 Pa. Super. 524
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that upon receipt of the “Important Notice,” a conclusive presumption of notice was established
- holding that, absent a written request by the named insured, an insurer’s agent was not authorized to fill in and circle choices on a form on behalf of the insured requesting reduced UIM amounts
- stating that the object of all interpretation and construction of statutes is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature
- determining that \[t]he intent of the General Assembly in enacting the MVFRL was to reduce the rising cost of purchasing motor vehicle insurance.\
- determining that “[t]he intent of the General Assembly in enacting the MVFRL was to reduce the rising cost of purchasing motor vehicle insurance.”
- stating that the object of all interpretation and construction of statutes is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Elliott, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.