Skip to main content
· 7/27/1995

Motorists Insurance Companies v. Emig

Citations

  • 664 A.2d 559
  • 444 Pa. Super. 524
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that upon receipt of the “Important Notice,” a conclusive presumption of notice was established
  • holding that, absent a written request by the named insured, an insurer’s agent was not authorized to fill in and circle choices on a form on behalf of the insured requesting reduced UIM amounts
  • stating that the object of all interpretation and construction of statutes is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature
  • determining that \[t]he intent of the General Assembly in enacting the MVFRL was to reduce the rising cost of purchasing motor vehicle insurance.\
  • determining that “[t]he intent of the General Assembly in enacting the MVFRL was to reduce the rising cost of purchasing motor vehicle insurance.”
  • stating that the object of all interpretation and construction of statutes is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Elliott, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.