Motor Vehicle Administration of the Maryland Department of Transportation v. Seidel Chevrolet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Re-visor’s Note, stating that the revision constituted “new language derived without substantive change,” showed that the new sections did not alter the original legislative intent
• “[M]ost courts have restricted application of the [collateral 37 source] rule to tort litigation[.]”
• “ ‘Payments made or benefits conferred by other sources are known as collateral-source benefits. They do not have the effect of reducing the recovery against the defendant.’ ” (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 920(A), comment b (1977))
• tracing the history of the collateral source rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).