Motor Transport Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing bankruptcy court’s authority to manage its own docket and holding that any such orders are reviewed only for abuse of discretion
• declining to dismiss pro se appeal due to untimeliness because, “since Appellant[s] ha[ve] raised the same arguments again and again in different fora, resolving Appellant[s’] claims on the merits will hopefully prevent further motions and further waste of judicial resources”
• “The [b]ankruptcy [c]ourt’s decision[] . . . approving payment of professionals’ fees . . . will be reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
• “The [b]ankruptcy [c]ourt’s decision[] . . . approving payment of professionals’ fees . . . will be reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
• confirming dismissal of Appellants’ duty of fair representation claim
• confirming dismissal of Appellants’ duty of fair representation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).