Motor Mart Co. v. Hull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inmate plaintiffs pleading was sufficient to state a negligence claim where he “essentially alleged, albeit inartfully, that (1) the state was negligent in misplacing his eyeglasses, (2) it was foreseeable that he would suffer harm as a result, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).