MOTOR CLUD INS. ASS'N v. Fillman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• doubting that insurance agents were professionals under Tylle definition, but declining to reach issue when claim was barred
• appellate court is not obligated to engage in analysis which is not needed to adjudicate case and controversy before it
• appellate court not obligated to engage in analysis which is not needed to decide case before it
• appellate court is not obligated to engage in analysis which is not needed to adjudicate case and controversy before it
• after setting forth description of “profession,” court stated that “[i]t would seem that insurance agents do not fall within the statutory or case law definition of ‘professionals’ for purposes of § 25-222”; but finding it was not necessary to decide issue in that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).