Motley v. Rapelje

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[i]n light of [district court’s] explication of the good faith defense [in original charge], there was no need for him to reiterate it” in supplemental instruction
• explaining that “[i]n light of [the district judge’s] explication of the good faith defense [in the original charge], there was no need for him to reiterate it” in the supplemental instruction
• “The district court correctly concluded that the money sought to be forfeited had been obtained through Daugerdas’s mail fraud.”
• ‘‘a district judge can take into account acquitted conduct in determining a sentence’’
• referring to “Rule 403’s balancing test”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).