Skip to main content
· 7/30/2007

Motley Rice, LLC v. Baldwin & Baldwin, LLP

Citations

  • 518 F. Supp. 2d 688
  • 69 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 632
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79705
  • 2007 WL 3084566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the Rule is meant to preserve comity and avoid duplicative litigation which the court defines as cases “in which there are no significant differences between the claims, parties, and available relief in the two suits”
  • the Rule is meant to preserve comity and avoid duplicative litigation which the court defines as cases “in which there are no significant differences between the claims, parties, and available relief in the two suits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patrick Michael Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.