Motionless Keyboard Company v. Microsoft Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment of non-infringement because the patentee “did not provide any particularized testimony to show infringement under the doctrine of equivalents”
• approving use of figure to construe disputed term in manner consistent with depiction in that figure
• \A terminal disclaimer is simply not an admission that a later-filed invention is obvious.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).