Motion Games, LLC v. Nintendo of America Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “there must be some findings of [factual] overlap between the qui tam claims and the [g]overnment claims before a [ ] [r]elator has a right to recover a share of the [g]overnment’s [settlement] proceeds” (first alteration in original
• concluding that “there must be some findings of [factual] overlap between the qui tam claims and the [g]overnment claims before a [ ] [r]elator has a right to recover a share of the [g]overnment’s [settlement] proceeds” (first alteration in original
• explaining that the relator worked closely with the government while the case was under seal by identifying potential witnesses, proposing categories of documents to be subpoenaed, and making presentations about the merits of the case
• considering whether to grant a “[p]ercentage award[] above the statutory [minimum of fifteen percent]”
• considering whether to grant a “[p]ercentage award[] above the statutory [minimum of fifteen percent]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).