Skip to main content
· 6/27/2008

Motichko v. Premium Asset Recovery Corp. (In Re Motichko)

Citations

  • 395 B.R. 25
  • 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2420
  • 2008 WL 4427937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that continued collection efforts such as collection calls and notices made to collect a discharged debt violate the discharge injunction
  • allowing adversary proceeding that alleged violation of the discharge injunction to proceed as such
  • construing a cause of action under section 524 as a contempt action
  • “To dismiss on procedural grounds alone would be to elevate form over substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kay Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.