Indiana Court of Appeals· 9/25/2002
Mote v. State
Citations
- 775 N.E.2d 687
- 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1592
- 2002 WL 31116798
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding defendant demonstrated prejudice that likely impacted the jury’s impression of his guilt or innocence from references to his past arrests and convictions that violated the motion in limine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mathias, Bailey, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Burks v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-06· cited 15×
- David Bisard v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-03-04· cited 15×
- James Hill v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-11-19
- Coreion Tae D. Gentry-Shelton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-16
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mickens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 100×
- Warren v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 96×
- Gregory v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 89×
- Heavrin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 66×
- Banks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-24· cited 39×
- Strowmatt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-09-29· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.