Mostowy v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding opinion testimony because the expert was “not as well-qualified as the trier of fact to answer” the question about the existence of probable cause
• affirming the district court’s decision to preclude questioning an expert about whether probable cause existed to make a traffic stop, “a question that [the expert] was not as well-qualified as the trier of fact to answer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).