Skip to main content
· 6/5/1996

Mostow v. State Farm Ins. Cos.

Citations

  • 668 N.E.2d 392
  • 88 N.Y.2d 321
  • 645 N.Y.S.2d 421
  • 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When construing an insurance contract, the tests to be applied are common speech and the reasonable expectation and purpose of the ordinary businessman.”
  • contract terms are ambiguous if “the policy may be reasonably interpreted in two conflicting manners”
  • “[T]he test to determine whether an insurance contract is ambiguous focuses on the reasonable expectations of the average insured upon reading the policy ... and employing common speech.”
  • “[T]he test to determine whether an insurance contract is ambiguous focuses on the reasonable expectations of the average insured upon reading the policy and employing common speech[.]”
  • “[0]ur precedent establishes that ambiguities in an insurance policy should be construed in favor of the insured and against the insurer, the drafter of the policy language .... ”
  • \[T]he test to determine whether an insurance contract is ambiguous focuses on the reasonable expectations of the average insured upon reading the policy . . . and employing common speech\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Titone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.