Skip to main content
· 7/2/2015

Mostofi v. Midland Funding, LLC

Citations

  • 223 Md. App. 687
  • 117 A.3d 639
  • 2015 Md. App. LEXIS 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because a judgment entered against a debtor in a collection case was not a void judgment, a new claim was barred by res judicata and the judgment could not be collaterally attacked in the subsequent action
  • “When a party is sued, and that party could bring a permissive counterclaim, he or she is not required to ‘raise or waive’ that counterclaim unless successful prosecution of it would nullify the other party’s claim.”
  • “When a party is sued, and that party could bring a permissive counterclaim, he or she is not required to ‘raise or waive’ that counterclaim unless successful prosecution of it would nullify the other party's claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Nazarian, Zarnoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.