Mostardi-Platt Associates, Inc. v. Czerniejewski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that surveying services done for the purpose of helping the defendant decide whether to exercise an option to purchase property were not done for the purpose of improving property and thus were not lienable
• concluding that surveying services done for the purpose of helping the defendant decide whether to exercise an option to purchase property were not done for the purpose of improving property and thus were not lienable
• rejecting an argument that certain preliminary services constituted improvements under the Act \because they [were] 'necessary' for the construction of a coal gasification facility on the property\
• rejecting an argument that certain preliminary services constituted improvements under the Act “because they [were] ‘necessary’ for the construction of a coal -5- gasification facility on the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).