Moss v. Sandefur

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the purpose of FAR Part 8.4 is to offer a “more simplified and flexible approach away from the more formal and rigorous procedures for negotiated procurements” under FAR Part 15
• finding that exchanges were clarifications partly because the offeror “provided no revisions or changes to its pricing in light of the [agency’s] inquiry”
• determining that an exchange was a clarification partly because “nothing in the Solicitation expressly required” the information requested by the Agency
• ”[I]f the court were to accept all' of [the] proposed redactions, it would ... result! ] in a nearly incomprehensible public document.”
• “[I]f the court were to accept all of [the] proposed redactions, it would ... result[ ] in a nearly incomprehensible public document.”
• “[I]f the court were to accept all of [the] proposed redactions, it would . . . result[] in a nearly incomprehensible public document.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).