Moss v. Porter Brothers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parol or extrinsic evidence of a usage or custom is not admissible where the contract expresses the intent of the parties in clear and unambiguous language
• summary judgment proper in contract action where affidavits submitted in opposition contained evidence inadmissible under the parol evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).