Skip to main content
· 12/16/2013

Moss v. Newyork

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 823
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3364
  • 571 U.S. 1111
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 688
  • 2013 WL 3948732
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 9136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that internal agency guidance, under which the agency \ must consider\ certain factors, provided sufficient law to apply (emphasis added)
  • noting that a court may look to \informal agency guidance\ to determine if there is law to be applied
  • citing, inter alia, Mach Mining, LLC v. EEOC, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1645, 1651, 191 L.Ed.2d 607 (2015)
  • reviewing the statute’s text and legislative history to determine whether or not the statute constituted a “grant of unbridled discretion”
  • noting that the word “shall” connotes a mandatory requirement
  • applying this exception to claims that challenged federal student loans as unlawful, even though all of the named plaintiffs’ loans had already been fully discharged in six months or fewer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.