Skip to main content
· 2/20/1996

Moss v. Nedas

Citations

  • 674 A.2d 174
  • 289 N.J. Super. 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting parent cannot be viewed as a \wallet\ and deprived of involvement of college decision making process
  • approving balancing of factors where PSA allocated costs \in proportion to [the parents'] ability to contribute\
  • noting a parent cannot be viewed as a \wallet\ and deprived of involvement in the college decision making process
  • upholding trial court’s refusal to require ex-husband to contribute to their daughter’s college costs based, in part, on “the absence of any meaningful relationship” between father and daughter
  • because father's interest in child's college plans were snubbed, father not obligated to contribute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges P.G. Levy and Eichen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.