· 2/20/1996
Moss v. Nedas
Citations
- 674 A.2d 174
- 289 N.J. Super. 352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting parent cannot be viewed as a \wallet\ and deprived of involvement of college decision making process
- approving balancing of factors where PSA allocated costs \in proportion to [the parents'] ability to contribute\
- noting a parent cannot be viewed as a \wallet\ and deprived of involvement in the college decision making process
- upholding trial court’s refusal to require ex-husband to contribute to their daughter’s college costs based, in part, on “the absence of any meaningful relationship” between father and daughter
- because father's interest in child's college plans were snubbed, father not obligated to contribute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges P.G. Levy and Eichen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.