Mosley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant was not entitled to a new trial because the State recreated the missing transcript of one trial day by calling three of the four witnesses who had testified that day as well as trial counsel for both parties
• concluding that Mosley was not entitled to a new trial when the State re-created the transcript of one missing day of trial based on a hearing at which three of the four witnesses called that day testified along with Mosley’s trial counsel and the prosecutor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Faust v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-02· cited 54×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2017-10-02· cited 23×
• Bamberg v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-02-28· cited 22×
• Clark v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-12-23· cited 20×
• Gadson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-18· cited 17×
• Anderson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-08-24· cited 11×
• Cross v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-09-08· cited 3×
• WILLIAMS v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-08-08· cited 1×
• JOHNSON v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-07· cited 1×
• Marlon Matta v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-05-05
• Anthony Todd Aaron v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2022-06-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Carr v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-02-03· cited 96×
• Glass v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-07-11· cited 34×
• Leeks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-02-16· cited 32×
• Glenn v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-02-16· cited 10×