Mosley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We strike condition seven (that part requiring 18 Mosley to inform her employer of her probationary status) because it was not orally pronounced.”
• “We strike condition seven (that part requiring 6 Mosley to inform her employer of her probationary status) because it was not orally pronounced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tory v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-26· cited 25×
• Houston v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-24· cited 5×
• Welborn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-15· cited 3×
• Catherine Capozzi v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-25
• Christopher Barbaro Mesa v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-03-18

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hart
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-02-22· cited 141×
• Justice v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-05-23· cited 73×
• Vasquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-25· cited 23×
• Shacraha v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-27· cited 11×
• Simmons v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-15· cited 1×
• Sosa v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-26· cited 1×