Skip to main content

Mosley v. Observer Publishing Co.

Citations

  • 619 A.2d 343
  • 422 Pa. Super. 255
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district attorney’s defamatory remarks about plaintiff were closely related to his official duties and thus protected by the doctrine of absolute privilege
  • concluding the alleged defamatory statements made within a search warrant did not lose their privileged status even if the warrant was “replete with ‘false’ statements[,]” holding that “once absolute privilege attaches, it may be neither lost nor destroyed.”
  • granting preliminary objections because the district attorney was immune from defamation suit as a high public official
  • County Attorney was high public official for purposes of absolute privilege
  • County Attorney was high public official for purposes of absolute privilege
  • County Attorney was high public official for purposes of absolute privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEwen, Tamilia, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mosley v. Observer Publishing Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.