Moskowitz v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding breach of contract claim preempted by § 560.2 because it would impose state substantive requirements regarding the disclosure of payoff statement fees, a loan-related fee
• consumer fraud and breach of contract claims premised on non-disclosure of a payoff statement fee preempted
• fax and other fees in payoff statement are \loan-related fees\ within the meaning of 12 C.F.R. § 560.2(b)(5)
• “The effect of plaintiff’s claim would be to impose, at the state level, a substantive requirement mandating when in the loan process such fees must be disclosed.”
• fax and other fees in payoff statement are “loan-related fees” within the meaning of 12 C.F.R. § 560.2(b)(5)
• claims under the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act preempted for the same reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).