California Supreme Court· 4/17/2000
Moshonov v. Walsh
Citations
- 996 P.2d 699
- 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 597
- 22 Cal. 4th 771
- 22 Cal. 771
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3863
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2892
- 2000 Cal. LEXIS 3333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the disputed issue of contractual interpretation . . . was committed to final adjudication by the arbitrator, rather than the courts, we decline, as did the Court of Appeal, to consider the issue’s merits.” (emphasis 3 added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Werdegar, Kennard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2008-08-25· cited 216×
- Pierotti v. TorianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-05-31· cited 101×
- Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-04-26· cited 97×
- Gueyffier v. Ann Summers, Ltd.California Supreme Court· 2008-06-09· cited 69×
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-01-29· cited 69×
- Ajida Technologies, Inc. v. Roos Instruments, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2001-03-01· cited 67×
- Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court· 2019-05-30· cited 66×
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2014-09-26· cited 53×
- Moore v. First Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-04-17· cited 47×
- Roehl v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-01-31· cited 37×
- Hightower v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Court of Appeal· 2001-02-28· cited 36×
- Alexander v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-05-03· cited 33×
- AJIDA TECHNOLOGIES v. Roos InstrumentsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-03-01· cited 33×
- Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-02-07· cited 29×
- Baugh v. GarlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-03-13· cited 26×
- Konig v. Fair Employment and Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-07-29· cited 25×
- Harris v. SandroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-03-21· cited 24×
- Corona v. Amherst PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-04-01· cited 24×
- Mave Enterprises, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 2013-09-26· cited 22×
- Delaney v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-06-24· cited 21×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 753×
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 281×
- Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1992-02-26· cited 160×
- William H. Hyle, Jr. v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Second Circuit· 1999-12-16· cited 54×
- DiMarco v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-01-30· cited 38×
- Creative Plastering, Inc. v. Hedley Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1993-11-05· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.