· 10/30/1989
Mosher v. Mayacamas Corp.
Citations
- 215 Cal. App. 3d 1
- 263 Cal. Rptr. 373
- 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 1081
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that such when facts are rendered mistaken by future events, they are “an ‘error in judgment’ ” rather than a mistake of fact
- finding trial court properly granted summary 1 judgment that plaintiff was entitled to full performance of contract where alleged mutual mistake 2 about future expectations was an “‘error in judgment’ rather than a mistake of fact or a failure of 3 consideration”
- finding trial court properly granted summary 1 judgment that plaintiff was entitled to full performance of contract where alleged mutual mistake 2 about future expectations was an “‘error in judgment’ rather than a mistake of fact or a failure of 3 consideration”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fogel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.