Mosher v. Markey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that questions directed to a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent cannot exceed the items identified in the notice
• reasoning that “the procedures set forth in the rule and the reasons for the rule’s adoption” imply that the topics listed in a 30(b)(6) deposition notice limit the scope of examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).