Moses v. K-Mart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Once the automatic stay provisions of FRCP 62(a) have expired, the enforcement of a judgment becomes a race between Plaintiff (seeking to seize assets to secure a judgment) and Defendant (posting an approved supersedeas bond to avoid the embarrassment of public seizure).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-01-11· cited 9×
• Ribbens International, S.A. v. Transport International Pool, Inc.
  C.D. California· 1999-03-29· cited 5×
• Whitehead v. K Mart Corp.
  S.D. Mississippi· 1999-03-30· cited 3×
• Whitehead v. Food Max of MS Inc
  Fifth Circuit· 2002-01-11

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. $2,490.00 in U.S. Currency, 2,610,000.00 in Mexican Pesos, and Walker B. Monroe, Claimant-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-08-27· cited 27×
• Sheldon v. Munford, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 1989-11-16· cited 13×
• Ascher v. Gutierrez
  District of Columbia· 1975-05-05· cited 10×
• Larry Santos Productions v. Joss Organization, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 1988-02-18· cited 9×
• Imperial Commodities Corp. v. Auxiliadora
  S.D. New York· 1987-04-09· cited 9×
• Secure Engineering Services, Ltd. v. International Technology Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1989-12-12· cited 8×
• Dr. Harry Kaplan v. Samuel Hirsh
  Fourth Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 7×
• North River Insurance v. Greater New York Mutual Insurance
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-08-01· cited 5×
• State Bank of Spring Hill v. Bucyrus Grain Co. (In Re Bucyrus Grain Co.)
  D. Kansas· 1991-04-22· cited 3×