Moser v. Driller's Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “there may be situations where the former employee retains a present connection or agency relationship with the client corporation” that would justify application of the privilege
• recognizing \there may be situations where the former employee retains a present connection or agency relationship with the client corporation\ that would justify application of the privilege
• Finding it 4 “far from clear that Rule 26(f) and (d) require an additional conference and discovery 5 plan each time a new party is named in an action.”
• counsel’s notes of a witness interview are typically not disclosed and “are accorded full work-product protection”
• “[T]he Court questions whether the affidavits themselves are true attorney work product .... An affidavit, after all, purports to be a statement of facts within the personal knowledge of the witness, and not an expression of the opinion of counsel.”
• questioning whether affidavits are trae attorney work product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).