Moser v. Department of the Treasury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel’s “conjugation of adultery with heroin” was inflammatory
• finding that it is improper for trial counsel to argue that the fact that the accused “asserted his rights” and “fought this every inch of the way” was indicative of his guilt
• finding trial counsel’s argument improperly drew a connection between the accused’s actions and unrelated offenses in order to inflame the passions and prejudices of the panel members
• improper to argue that accused \asserted his rights\ and \fought this every inch of the way\
• improper to argue that accused “asserted his rights” and “fought this every inch of the way”
• critiqu- ing “discours[ing] on the practices and fantasies of rapists, and . . . the attitudes of unrelated rape victims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).