Skip to main content

Moseley v. State

Citations

  • 112 Miss. 854
  • 73 So. 791

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law. Argument or prosecution. Invoicing race prejudice.</p> <p>Where a negress was being prosecuted for selling whisky .and the only witness for the state was a white man, it was reversible error for the district attorney to state to the jury, “it is just a question whether or not you believe this negro or the white witness,” naming him, and his retort when appellant’s counsel objected, to further say ‘‘she is a negro; look at her skin; if she is not a negro I don’t want you to convict her” where the court when appealed to, did not rule on the objection but merely said, “well what is she.”</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “. . . This injection of race questions into court trials has been uniformly condemned by this court.”
  • \. . . This injection of race questions into court trials has been uniformly condemned by this court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.