Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the petitioner “attacked not only the subcontracts, but also the arbitration clauses contained therein, as having been procured through fraud,” the district court must determine whether there was fraud in the inducement of the arbitration clause
• if there is a substantial allegation of fraudulent inducement that would negate the existence of an agreement to arbitrate, “it seems clear that the issue of fraud should first be adjudicated before the rights of the parties . . . can be determined”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
• Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox
  Supreme Court· 1965-01-25· cited 1,309×
• Haynsworth v. the Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-08-29· cited 310×
• Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-13· cited 164×
• Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak Street
  California Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 151×
• Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-21· cited 110×
• American Safety Equipment Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co.
  Second Circuit· 1968-03-20· cited 106×
• Shaffer v. Jeffery
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-03-26· cited 96×
• Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of America
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-02-25· cited 86×
• In Re Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-01-02· cited 73×
• Main v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-02-10· cited 73×
• Campaniello Imports, Ltd. v. Saporiti Italia S.p.A.
  Second Circuit· 1997-06-26· cited 72×
• Arnold v. Arnold Corp.-Printed Communications for Business
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-12-03· cited 63×
• United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Hendry Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1968-06-20· cited 54×
• In the Matter or Lowell S. Fallick, Bankrupt-Appellant v. Harry Kehr
  Second Circuit· 1966-12-14· cited 51×
• Warren Brothers Company, Etc. v. Cardi Corporation
  First Circuit· 1973-01-11· cited 51×
• Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-05-24· cited 38×
• Two Sisters, Inc. v. Gosch & Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-08-31· cited 34×
• Litton RCS, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-05-15· cited 33×
• Ford v. Shearson Lehman American Express, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-05-13· cited 33×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1959-10-28· cited 370×

Other cases named Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Moseley v. Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1962-12-03