Moseley v. City of Kansas City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a sixteen-year-old boy has been backward in his work at school is not deemed sufficient [to include him within the attractive nuisance doctrine] unless there is a showing that the backward ness in his studies is the result of mental impairment or deficiency
• child who climbed city’s utility pole, which cax'ried electricity and telephone wbres, was a trespasser to whom no duty was owed other than to not willfully or wantonly injure him
• pole on city street corner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).