· 5/8/1951
Moseley v. City of Birmingham
Citations
- 36 Ala. App. 85
- 52 So. 2d 396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a plaintiff’s “two-year delay before seeking amendment was undue” and unjustified
- finding that plaintiff who prevailed in bid protest was not entitled to amend complaint to add claim for proposal preparation costs, when there was a two-year delay in seeking amendment, and plaintiff failed to justify the delay
- finding that plaintiff who prevailed in bid protest was not entitled to amend complaint to add claim for proposal preparation costs, when there was a two-year delay in seeking amendment, and plaintiff failed to justify the delay
- discussing different burdens of proof for injunctive relief and for a monetary award of bid preparation costs
- “Merely proving that other cases allowed longer delays ... does not suffice to demonstrate entitlement to amendment. Delay must be justified.”
- “Merely proving that other cases allowed longer delays or delays until appeal or thereafter does not suffice to demonstrate entitlement to amendment. Delay must be justified.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.