Skip to main content
· 5/8/1951

Moseley v. City of Birmingham

Citations

  • 36 Ala. App. 85
  • 52 So. 2d 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a plaintiff’s “two-year delay before seeking amendment was undue” and unjustified
  • finding that plaintiff who prevailed in bid protest was not entitled to amend complaint to add claim for proposal preparation costs, when there was a two-year delay in seeking amendment, and plaintiff failed to justify the delay
  • finding that plaintiff who prevailed in bid protest was not entitled to amend complaint to add claim for proposal preparation costs, when there was a two-year delay in seeking amendment, and plaintiff failed to justify the delay
  • discussing different burdens of proof for injunctive relief and for a monetary award of bid preparation costs
  • “Merely proving that other cases allowed longer delays ... does not suffice to demonstrate entitlement to amendment. Delay must be justified.”
  • “Merely proving that other cases allowed longer delays or delays until appeal or thereafter does not suffice to demonstrate entitlement to amendment. Delay must be justified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.