Skip to main content
· 4/16/2007

Moseley v. Board of Education of Albuquerque Public Schools

Citations

  • 483 F.3d 689
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding student’s ADA and Rehabilitation Act declaratory-judgment action moot following his graduation because declaration would “have no effect on the present or future actions of either party”
  • dismissing the claim as moot only because claimant “failed to request either reimbursement or compensatory education services in his complaint”
  • finding case moot in light of the student’s graduation because the “tenor of the entire complaint and proceedings” was “for injunctive relief”
  • declining to address a plaintiff’s arguments that “his claims present a live controversy because the IDEA allows for reimbursement and compensatory education services” when he “never requested such relief” and failed to “articulate any equitable relief that 13 (...continued
  • “[B]ecause the underlying substantive claims are moot, [the plaintiff] cannot recover attorney’s fees and costs.”
  • “[student] failed to request . . . compensatory education services in his complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.