· 11/20/1984
Moseley v. Bishop
Citations
- 470 N.E.2d 773
- 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 3048
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an 1896 agreement regarding installing and “permanently maintain[ing]” drain tile was held to be a covenant running with the land and imposing an obligation on a remote grantee to maintain and replace the tile
- holding that an 1896 agreement regarding installing and “permanently maintain[ing]” drain tile was held to be a covenant running with the land and imposing an obligation on a remote grantee to maintain and replace the tile
- agreement to maintain drainage tile made in same document and in context of transfer of easement
- agreement to maintain drainage tile made in same document and in context of transfer of easement
- also noting the covenant's use of the term \permanently\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young, Miller, Conover
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.