Skip to main content
· 11/20/1984

Moseley v. Bishop

Citations

  • 470 N.E.2d 773
  • 1984 Ind. App. LEXIS 3048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an 1896 agreement regarding installing and “permanently maintain[ing]” drain tile was held to be a covenant running with the land and imposing an obligation on a remote grantee to maintain and replace the tile
  • holding that an 1896 agreement regarding installing and “permanently maintain[ing]” drain tile was held to be a covenant running with the land and imposing an obligation on a remote grantee to maintain and replace the tile
  • agreement to maintain drainage tile made in same document and in context of transfer of easement
  • agreement to maintain drainage tile made in same document and in context of transfer of easement
  • also noting the covenant's use of the term \permanently\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Miller, Conover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.